01 · A and no delay
Find the complete path probability.
Hint
The no-delay probability on A is 0.9.
Worked solution
0.6×0.9=0.54.
Understand · explore · practise
Interpret second-stage probabilities conditional on a route or group, form weighted totals across disjoint branches, and check what independence would require.
Before you startTree diagrams, complements and path probabilities.
01 / Read a branch in its context
P(A and delay)=P(A)P(delay given A).
Path multiplication remains valid with conditional branch values; independence is not required.
Here, 10% is the delay chance among route-A parcels. It is not the probability that a randomly chosen parcel both uses A and is delayed. The first branch determines how much weight that group receives.
A parcel uses route A with probability w and route B otherwise. Delay chance: 10% on A,30% on B. These are model probabilities conditional on route.
At w=0, all parcels use route B, so the delay probability is 0.30.
02 / Calculate each complete path
Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.
A and delay: 0.6×0.1=0.06
Six percent of all parcels follow this path.
B and delay: 0.4×0.3=0.12
Twelve percent of all parcels follow this path.
Total delay: 0.06+0.12=0.18
The two delayed paths are disjoint and cover every delayed parcel.
Find the complete path probability.
The no-delay probability on A is 0.9.
0.6×0.9=0.54.
Find the complete path probability.
The no-delay probability on B is 0.7.
0.4×0.7=0.28.
03 / Add weighted conditional probabilities
P(delay)=w×0.10+(1−w)×0.30.
The groups must be disjoint and exhaustive for this two-branch sum.
Why is(0.10+0.30)/2=0.20 wrong when w=0.6?
The routes are not equally likely.
A has 60% weight and B 40%. The correct weighted result is 0.18. A simple average works here only when each route has 50% weight.
Check the four complete path probabilities sum to1.
Include both delay outcomes for each route.
0.06+0.54+0.12+0.28=1.
Find P(no delay) in two ways.
Add the two no-delay paths or complement delay.
0.54+0.28=0.82, also 1−0.18=0.82.
04 / Change the weights, not the branch meanings
Find P(delay) if A and B are equally likely.
Set w=0.5.
0.5×0.1+0.5×0.3=0.20.
Find P(delay) for w=0.75.
The route-B weight is 0.25.
0.75 × 0.1 + 0.25 × 0.3 = 0.075 + 0.075 = 0.15.
For w=0.75, does B contribute more delayed parcels because its delay rate is larger?
Compare the complete path probabilities.
No. A and delay and B and delay each have probability 0.075. The larger B conditional rate is balanced by its smaller route share.
05 / Solve for an unknown mixture
0.10w+0.30(1−w)=0.14
Use the weighted total.
0.30−0.20w=0.14
Collect like terms.
w=0.8
This is a valid probability, so 80% use route A.
Can these same two route rates produce overall delay 0.05 by changing w?
A weighted average cannot fall below the smaller rate.
No. For 0≤w≤1, the total lies in[0.10,0.30]. Solving formally gives w=1.25, an invalid weight.
At w=0.6, among delayed parcels, what fraction came from B?
Restrict the denominator to delayed parcels.
P(B given delay)=0.12/0.18=2/3. This differs from P(delay given B)=0.30; the conditioning direction matters.
06 / Compare the group-specific chances
At w=0.6, test independence of route A and delay.
Compare P(A and delay) with P(A)P(delay).
0.06 differs from0.6×0.18=0.108. They are dependent; also P(delay given A)=0.10 differs from the overall 0.18.
If both routes instead had delay probability 0.2, what would the overall delay probability be?
Factor the common conditional rate.
0.2w+0.2(1−w)=0.2. With both route probabilities positive, the unchanged conditional chance shows independence of route and delay.
07 / State where the probabilities came from
The 10% and30% rates were estimated from last month. Is0.18 necessarily exact for next month?
The future process may differ.
No. It is a model estimate using those conditional rates and the assumed 60/40 route mix. Changes in traffic, procedures or selection can change the result.
A third route handles some parcels but is omitted. Can A and B still be assigned probabilities 0.6 and0.4 for all parcels?
Their probabilities already sum to1.
Not if a positive share uses the third route. The first-stage branches must describe every eligible parcel exactly once, or the experiment must explicitly restrict selection to A/B parcels.
08 / Weight, multiply and add
Multiply each group weight by the event chance within that group. Add across disjoint exhaustive groups. Keep the conditioning direction clear, check totals against the range of group rates and state assumptions when using estimated probabilities.
Section 1 of 8 · Read a branch in its context