01 · A different overlap
If the same marginals have overlap 0.12, are the events independent?
Hint
Compare 0.12 with 0.6×0.4.
Worked solution
No. 0.12≠0.24. Also P(B given A)=0.12/0.6=0.2, which differs from 0.4.
Understand · explore · practise
Test independence using the intersection product, calculate probabilities with complements, and distinguish an assumed model from evidence in observed data.
Before you startVenn regions, the addition rule and complements.
01 / Compare the intersection with the product
A and B are independent when P(A ∩ B)=P(A)P(B).
When P(A)>0, this is equivalent to P(B given A)=P(B).
The “given A” proportion is P(A∩B)/P(A): restrict the eligible outcomes to A. Independence says that this restriction leaves the probability of B unchanged. If either event has probability 0, use the product definition rather than divide by 0.
Keep P(A)=0.6 and P(B)=0.4 fixed. Adjust P(A∩B) and compare it with the product 0.24.
At overlap 0, the four region probabilities are A only 0.6, both 0, B only 0.4, neither 0. These events are mutually exclusive and dependent because0≠0.24.
02 / Test before multiplying
Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.
P(A)P(B)=0.6×0.4=0.24
This matches the known intersection, so the events are independent.
P(B given A)=0.24/0.6=0.4
The probability of B is unchanged within A.
The four regions are 0.36,0.24,0.16,0.24
They are nonnegative and sum to 1.
If the same marginals have overlap 0.12, are the events independent?
Compare 0.12 with 0.6×0.4.
No. 0.12≠0.24. Also P(B given A)=0.12/0.6=0.2, which differs from 0.4.
Only P(A)=0.6 and P(B)=0.4 are given. Can you calculate P(A∩B) as 0.24?
What additional information is required?
Only if independence is stated or justified. The marginals alone allow any overlap from 0 to 0.4.
03 / Independence also works with complements
If A and B are independent:
P(A ∩ B′)=P(A)(1−P(B))
P(A′ ∩ B′)=(1−P(A))(1−P(B)).
These identities follow by subtracting regions from the known totals.
Using the independent 0.6 and0.4 model, find P(A∩B′).
Subtract the overlap from P(A), or multiply by P(B′).
0.6−0.24=0.36. Equivalently 0.6×0.6=0.36.
Find P(A′∩B′).
Both complementary events must occur.
0.4×0.6=0.24. The complements are independent too.
Find P(exactly one of A and B).
Add A only and B only.
0.36+0.16=0.52. Equivalently 0.6×0.6+0.4×0.4.
04 / At least one is often a complement
Neither sounds: 0.3×0.2=0.06
Use the complementary probabilities.
At least one sounds: 1−0.06=0.94
This includes the possibility that both sound.
Both sound:0.7×0.8=0.56
The addition rule also gives 0.7+0.8−0.56=0.94.
Find the probability exactly one sounds.
One sounds and the other does not, in either order.
0.7×0.2+0.3×0.8=0.14+0.24=0.38.
Why might independence be questionable for two alarms in the same room?
Could they share a cause or failure mechanism?
Shared power, environment or faults can link their outcomes. The calculations are valid under an independent-alarm model; physical separation or a verbal story alone does not prove the assumption.
05 / Find an unknown probability
Independent events satisfy P(A)=0.35 and P(A∩B)=0.14. Find P(B).
Solve 0.35×P(B)=0.14.
P(B)=0.14/0.35=0.4.
Independent events satisfy P(A)=0.3 and P(A′∩B′)=0.42. Find P(B).
P(A′)=0.7.
0.7(1−P(B))=0.42, so 1−P(B)=0.6 and P(B)=0.4.
06 / A table can test a finite model
Among 100 records, 40 have A,50 have B and20 have both. For uniform selection of one record, are A and B independent?
Compare 20/100 with(40/100)(50/100).
Yes for this finite selection model:0.2=0.4×0.5.
Does that table prove independence in the wider population that produced the records?
Observed frequencies vary from sample to sample.
No. The exact finite-record calculation does not prove a population property. Sampling variation, collection methods and other evidence matter.
07 / Know which independence is given
Events with probabilities 0.2 and0.3 are mutually exclusive. Are they independent?
Compare their intersection with the product.
No. The intersection probability is 0 but the product is 0.06. Both probabilities are positive.
For more than two events, is pairwise independence alone enough to multiply all their probabilities for a joint event?
Pairwise statements concern only pairs.
No. A model requiring several events together needs the appropriate mutual independence. Do not extend a two-event test beyond the information given.
08 / Use the product only with a justified model
Compare the intersection with the product when testing independence. When independence is given, calculate intersections and complementary intersections by multiplication, then use the addition or complement rule for unions. State assumptions and avoid treating sample proportions as proof of a wider property.
Section 1 of 8 · Compare the intersection with the product