01 · All three
Find P(SSS).
Hint
Multiply all three success chances.
Worked solution
(1/2)(3/5)(3/4)=9/40.
Understand · explore · practise
Enumerate three-stage events, distinguish exactly from at least, calculate first-success probabilities and state the independence needed when repeating whole experiments or sampling groups.
Before you startProbability trees, complements and independence.
01 / Define the whole outcome
With two possible results at each of three stages, there are eight complete paths.
Multiply the appropriate probabilities along a path, then add the qualifying paths.
Independence lets this model use the stated stage probabilities after any earlier result. Unequal stage probabilities mean different paths need not be equally likely.
Three mutually independent stages have success probabilities 1/2,3/5,3/4. S=success,F=failure. The stages do not all have the same success chance.
No successes: FFF, probability(1/2)(2/5)(1/4)=1/20.
02 / Count successes in each path
Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.
SSF: (1/2)(3/5)(1/4)=3/40
Failure is at the third stage.
SFS: (1/2)(2/5)(3/4)=6/40
Failure is at the second stage.
FSS: (1/2)(3/5)(3/4)=9/40
Exactly-two probability=(3+6+9)/40=9/20.
Find P(SSS).
Multiply all three success chances.
(1/2)(3/5)(3/4)=9/40.
Find the probability of exactly one success.
Add SFF,FSF,FFS.
SFF=2/40, FSF=3/40, FFS=6/40. Total 11/40.
03 / Use the complementary event
Find P(FFF).
Use all three failure chances.
(1/2)(2/5)(1/4)=2/40=1/20.
Find P(at least one success).
Complement none.
1−1/20=19/20.
Find P(at least two successes).
Exactly two or exactly three.
18/40+9/40=27/40.
Verify probabilities for 0,1,2,3 successes sum to 1.
Use2/40,11/40,18/40,9/40.
(2+11+18+9)/40=1.
04 / First success imposes earlier failures
The path must start with two failures
Only FFS qualifies.
P(first at 3)=(1/2)(2/5)(3/4)=3/20
Multiplying just the third success probability would ignore earlier results.
First at 1:1/2; first at 2:(1/2)(3/5)=3/10
Together with first at 3 and no success, these disjoint cases sum to 1.
Find the probability of a first success by the end of stage 2.
Either first at 1 or first at 2.
1/2+3/10=4/5, also1−(1/2)(2/5).
For independent trials with success chance 0.2, find the probability of the first success on trial 3.
Fail twice then succeed.
0.8×0.8×0.2=0.128. This uses identical independent trial probabilities.
05 / Respect a stopping limit
With independent success chance 0.2 per trial, find the probability of at least one success within four trials.
Complement four consecutive failures.
1−0.8⁴=1−0.4096=0.5904.
Why does allowing four trials not guarantee success?
The failure path has positive probability.
All four can fail, with probability 0.8⁴=0.4096. A larger number of opportunities does not make a finite guarantee.
06 / Repeat a whole experiment
Both passes: (27/40)²=729/1600
Independence is now stated between whole experiments.
Exactly one pass:2(27/40)(13/40)=351/800
The two pass/fail orders have equal probabilities in this repeated identical model.
At least one pass:1−(13/40)²=1431/1600
Complement two failures of the whole experiment.
Can these powers be used if a shared fault links the two experiments?
The experiment-level outcomes may be dependent.
Not without further information. The simple products rely on independent repetitions; a shared fault may change the conditional chance in the second run.
07 / Dependence within groups can coexist with independence between groups
In each group, each person succeeds with probability 0.6, but the probability both succeed is 0.4. Two groups are sampled independently from this model. Find the probability all four people succeed.
Use the probability for both succeeding in one group.
0.4×0.4=0.16. Using 0.6⁴ would incorrectly assume independence of the two people within each group.
For those two independently sampled groups, find the probability at least one group has both people succeed.
A group fails the both-success event with probability 0.6.
1−0.6²=0.64. The group event is defined before using the complement.
Does choosing two groups without replacement from a small fixed list automatically justify independent group outcomes?
Selection changes which groups remain.
No. Use the finite-list counts or conditional information. The independent-group calculation requires that assumption or a sampling process that supports it.
08 / Separate paths, counts and repetitions
List complete paths for exactly-count events, use complements for at-least questions and require earlier failures when finding a first success. When repeating experiments or sampling groups, define the group event and state the independence assumption before multiplying.
Section 1 of 8 · Define the whole outcome