01 · A colder object
In the same surroundings, an object starts at 5°C. Give θ(t) using the same k.
Hint
The initial difference is negative.
Worked solution
θ(t) = 20 − 15e⁻ᵏᵗ. Its temperature increases towards 20°C.
Understand · explore · practise
Solve cooling and limiting-value differential equations. Model approach to equilibrium, constant inflow with proportional removal, logistic growth and the difference between a limit and an attained value.
Before you startSeparation of variables, exponential decay, logarithms and partial fractions.
01 / Model the difference from equilibrium
y′ = −k(y − L) → y = L + (y₀ − L)e⁻ᵏᵗ
For k > 0, L is a stable equilibrium and y₀ is the initial value.
Above L, the derivative is negative; below L, it is positive. At L, the derivative is zero. The difference y − L decays exponentially, while the whole quantity need not be an exponential tending to zero.
At t = 0, y = 80; excess y − 20 = 60.
Rate y′ = −12.
The value decreases towards 20 from above.
The limit is 20, but a non-equilibrium solution never reaches it at finite time.
The dashed line is the equilibrium. Each equal time interval multiplies the difference from 20 by the same factor; it does not multiply the whole value by that factor.
02 / Use temperature difference in Newton’s cooling model
dθ/dt = −k(θ − 20), k > 0
Rate is proportional to excess temperature, with a negative sign.
dθ/(θ − 20) = −k dt
Separate for θ ≠ 20.
ln|θ − 20| = −kt + C
Integrate.
θ = 20 + Ae⁻ᵏᵗ; A = 60
Apply θ(0) = 80.
θ = 20 + 60e⁻ᵏᵗ
The excess above room temperature decays.
Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.
In the same surroundings, an object starts at 5°C. Give θ(t) using the same k.
The initial difference is negative.
θ(t) = 20 − 15e⁻ᵏᵗ. Its temperature increases towards 20°C.
03 / Use a later temperature to find k
50 − 20 = 60e⁻¹⁰ᵏ
Use the excess temperature 30, not the total 50.
e⁻¹⁰ᵏ = 1/2
The excess has halved.
k = ln 2 / 10 per minute
Take logarithms.
θ(t) = 20 + 60 × 2^(−t/10)
At 20 minutes, θ = 35°C.
What temperature does this model predict at t = 30 minutes?
The excess has halved three times.
20 + 60/8 = 27.5°C.
Does θ = 50°C at 10 minutes mean the temperature halves every ten minutes?
Identify what decays exponentially.
No. The excess θ − 20 halves; the total temperature does not.
04 / Solve for a target above the limiting temperature
25 − 20 = 60 × 2^(−t/10)
The target excess is 5.
2^(−t/10) = 1/12
Divide by 60.
t = 10ln 12 / ln 2
About 35.85 minutes.
Can this model reach 15°C for t ≥ 0?
Its excess above 20 stays positive.
No. It approaches 20°C from above.
Does the object reach exactly 20°C at a finite time?
Can a positive exponential equal zero?
No. It tends to 20°C as t → ∞, unless it started at equilibrium.
05 / Combine constant input with proportional removal
M′ = 6 − 0.2M = −0.2(M − 30)
The equilibrium is 6/0.2 = 30 units.
M = 30 + Ae^(−0.2t)
Use the approach-to-equilibrium family.
A = −30
Apply the empty initial state.
M = 30(1 − e^(−0.2t))
It increases towards 30, with initial rate 6.
With the same rates but M(0) = 50, find M(t).
The initial excess above 30 is 20.
M = 30 + 20e^(−0.2t). It decreases towards 30.
For Q′ = 12 − 0.3Q, find the equilibrium amount.
Set Q′ = 0.
Q = 40.
06 / Check constant solutions before dividing
If y = L, both sides are zero
Check this before dividing by y − L.
For y ≠ L, integrate dy/(y − L) = −k dt
Obtain the non-equilibrium branches.
y = L + Ae⁻ᵏᵗ, A any real constant
A = 0 includes the checked equilibrium.
For y′ = −0.4(y − 10), what is the sign of y′ when y = 6?
Substitute into the right-hand side.
y′ = 1.6 > 0, so the value increases.
Why is L a stable equilibrium when k > 0?
Inspect the derivative on both sides.
Above L the value decreases; below L it increases. Both motions approach L.
07 / Let proportional growth slow near a capacity
P′ = rP(1 − P/K)
Take r > 0 and K > 0. The equilibria are P = 0 and P = K.
For 0 < P < K, growth is positive but the per-unit rate r(1 − P/K) decreases as P rises. For P > K, the derivative is negative. K is the model’s limiting capacity for positive initial values, subject to its assumptions.
For K = 600, classify the rate at P = 0, 300, 600 and 900.
Use the signs of P and 1 − P/600.
Zero, positive, zero, negative respectively.
08 / Separate logistic growth using partial fractions
K/[P(K − P)] dP = r dt
Separate variables.
K/[P(K − P)] = 1/P + 1/(K − P)
Recombine to check the identity.
ln|P| − ln|K − P| = rt + C
The second integral has a minus sign.
P/(K − P) = Beʳᵗ on a chosen branch
Absorb its fixed sign into the constant.
P = K/(1 + Ae⁻ʳᵗ)
This describes positive initial-value solutions with the appropriate A; also record the excluded equilibrium P = 0.
For P(0) = P₀ > 0, find A in P = K/(1 + Ae⁻ʳᵗ).
Substitute t = 0.
A = K/P₀ − 1. If P₀ = K, A = 0 recovers the checked equilibrium.
Combine 1/P + 1/(K − P).
Use denominator P(K − P).
[(K − P) + P]/[P(K − P)] = K/[P(K − P)].
09 / Calibrate a logistic initial state
A = 600/100 − 1 = 5
Apply the initial value.
P(t) = 600/(1 + 5e^(−0.3t))
For t ≥ 0 it remains positive and below 600.
P = 300 when 1 + 5e^(−0.3t) = 2
Set a target amount.
t = ln 5 / 0.3
About 5.36 days.
P → 600 as t → ∞
Starting below capacity, it does not reach exactly 600 at finite time.
If P₀ = 900 with K = 600, what is A and what happens for t ≥ 0?
Use K/P₀ − 1.
A = −1/3. The denominator remains positive, and the solution decreases from 900 towards 600.
10 / Interpret assumptions and asymptotes in context
The cooling model assumes fixed surroundings and a constant proportional coefficient. The input-removal model assumes fixed input and proportional removal throughout. Logistic growth assumes a fixed capacity and a particular dependence of rate on amount. Changing conditions, measurement resolution and discrete populations can limit these models.
Why can a large change in surrounding temperature invalidate the calibrated cooling formula?
The model held its equilibrium temperature fixed.
The target temperature and possibly the coefficient change, so the original fixed-parameter equation no longer describes the same process.
Does writing lim P(t) = K prove P(t) = K for some finite t?
A horizontal asymptote need not be reached.
No. The non-equilibrium logistic branches approach K without attaining it at finite time.
11 / Find equilibrium, solve the difference, interpret the limit
Solve y′ = 2(7 − y), with y(0) = 3, and state the limit.
The equilibrium is 7 and the initial difference is −4.
y = 7 − 4e⁻²ᵗ, tending to 7 from below as t → ∞.
Section 1 of 11 · Model the difference from equilibrium