01 · Select the target
Which equation should you solve to locate stationary points of F(x) = eˣ + x³/3 − 2x?
Hint
Differentiate once.
Worked solution
Solve F′(x) = eˣ + x² − 2 = 0. Its derivative for Newton is F″(x) = eˣ + 2x.
Understand · explore · practise
Use numerical methods on first and second derivatives to find stationary and inflection points. Choose the correct Newton denominator, restore original coordinates, verify accuracy and classify with sign changes.
Before you startDifferentiation; stationary and inflection points; Newton–Raphson
01 / Solve an equation for the feature you want
Stationary input: F′(x) = 0. Inflection candidate: F″(x) = 0, where these derivatives exist.
Numerical root methods can be applied to a derivative just as they can to an original function. Name the target G clearly: G = F′ for stationary inputs, or G = F″ for smooth inflection candidates.
After finding a candidate input α, calculate its ordinate from the original F and classify the point. A zero second derivative alone is not enough to establish an inflection.
Stationary target: G(x) = F′(x) = exp(x) + x² − 2.
Start at x₀ = −1.5.
Restore the original ordinate with F(xₙ).
Newton uses G/G′, so this stationary-point calculation divides F′ by F″.
The approximate input must be classified before it is called a maximum, minimum or inflection point.
The two graph views share their scales. Values are computed at full stored precision. A displayed residual of zero at a late step reflects machine precision; the written sign checks justify the feature.
02 / Differentiate the target in Newton’s formula
G′(x) = F″(x)
Differentiate the equation actually being solved.
xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F′(xₙ)/F″(xₙ)
This is Newton’s method for F′ = 0.
For an inflection candidate, instead set G = F″
Then G′ = F‴.
The inflection-candidate update is xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F″(xₙ)/F‴(xₙ)
Where this quotient is defined; classification still follows separately.
Which equation should you solve to locate stationary points of F(x) = eˣ + x³/3 − 2x?
Differentiate once.
Solve F′(x) = eˣ + x² − 2 = 0. Its derivative for Newton is F″(x) = eˣ + 2x.
For the same F, write F‴(x) and the Newton update for an inflection candidate.
Differentiate F″, not F again from scratch.
F‴(x) = eˣ + 2. Thus xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − [exp(xₙ) + 2xₙ]/[exp(xₙ) + 2].
03 / Find the left stationary input
F′(−1.5) > 0 and F′(−1) < 0
There is a stationary input between −1.5 and −1.
Start x₀ = −1.5 and apply Newton to F′
Use denominator F″ = eˣ + 2x.
x₁ ≈ −1.329617451507
First substitution.
x₂ ≈ −1.316061843802; x₃ ≈ −1.315973781517
The input approaches about −1.31597378.
Calculate F at the refined input
The ordinate is approximately 2.14049849.
Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.
If a root of F′ is α ≈ −1.31597378, is the stationary point (α, 0)?
The zero belongs to F′, not to F.
No. The stationary point is (α, F(α)), approximately (−1.3160, 2.1405). The point (α, 0) lies on the derivative graph.
04 / Use another bracket for the other stationary input
F′(0) = −1 and F′(1) = e − 1 > 0
There is another stationary input between 0 and 1.
Start x₀ = 0.5
Use the same stationary-target Newton formula.
x₁ ≈ 0.538236839195
First substitution.
x₂ ≈ 0.537275065501; x₃ ≈ 0.537274449174
The input is approximately 0.53727445.
F(x) is approximately 0.68848450 there
The original curve point is approximately (0.5373, 0.6885).
There are no further stationary inputs: F‴ = eˣ + 2 is positive, so F″ is strictly increasing from a negative to a positive value and has one zero. Therefore F′ first decreases and then increases. Since F′ tends to +∞ at both ends and its minimum is negative, its two bracketed roots are the only ones.
A Newton calculation has found the positive stationary input. What supports searching for a second one on the negative side?
Use the derivative signs already found.
F′(−1.5) > 0 and F′(−1) < 0 bracket a distinct negative root of F′. A single successful Newton run cannot rule it out.
05 / Classify the stationary points
At the negative input, F″ ≈ −2.36373454 < 0
The stationary point is a local maximum.
At the positive input, F″ ≈ 2.78588506 > 0
The stationary point is a local minimum.
Alternatively, inspect the sign of F′ around each input
Positive to negative means a local maximum; negative to positive means a local minimum.
If F″ is zero, this simple second-derivative classification is inconclusive
Use a sign test or further analysis.
For H(x) = x⁴, H′(0) = H″(0) = 0. Is the point unclassifiable?
Check H′ on either side.
No. H′(x) = 4x³ changes from negative to positive, so (0, 0) is a local minimum. Only the simple second-derivative test was inconclusive.
For H(x) = x³, explain why solving H′ = 0 gives neither a maximum nor a minimum.
H′(x) = 3x² is positive on both sides of zero.
The curve increases on both sides, so it does not turn. Since H″(x) = 6x changes sign, (0, 0) is a stationary inflection.
06 / Solve the second derivative equation
G(−0.5) < 0 and G(0) = 1 > 0
There is a candidate between −0.5 and 0.
G′(x) = eˣ + 2 > 0
The target is strictly increasing, so this root is unique.
Start x₀ = −0.5 and use xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − G(xₙ)/G′(xₙ)
The denominator is the third derivative of F.
x₁ ≈ −0.349044806428; x₂ ≈ −0.351732769537
Continue with stored precision.
x₃ ≈ −0.351733711249
This gives the inflection candidate input.
A student uses xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F(xₙ)/F′(xₙ) to find an inflection point. What equation is that iteration actually solving?
Look at the numerator.
It is Newton’s method for F(x) = 0, seeking a horizontal-axis intercept. For a smooth inflection candidate it should target F″ = 0 instead.
07 / Verify that the candidate is an inflection
F″ is strictly increasing and crosses zero at β
It is negative immediately to the left and positive immediately to the right.
The original curve changes from concave down to concave up
This proves an inflection, rather than just a zero second derivative.
F(β) ≈ 1.392429744951
Restore the original ordinate.
F′(β) ≈ −1.17281597, which is not zero
The inflection is nonstationary.
The point is approximately (−0.3517, 1.3924)
State coordinates on the original curve.
For H(x) = x⁴, H″(0) = 0. Why is zero not an inflection input?
H″(x) = 12x².
The second derivative is positive on both sides of zero, so concavity does not change. The zero alone is insufficient.
08 / Use the original ordinate and original slope
β ≈ −0.351733711249
This is the root of the second derivative target.
The original ordinate is F(β) ≈ 1.392429744951
It is not F″(β), which is approximately zero.
The tangent gradient is F′(β) ≈ −1.172815973872
It is not the derivative of the root target.
A tangent equation is y − F(β) = F′(β)(x − β)
Use unrounded values until the requested final accuracy.
What is the tangent equation at the local minimum of F, using its ordinate rounded to 4 d.p.?
A stationary tangent is horizontal.
y ≈ 0.6885. The exact equation is y = F(α), where α is the positive root of F′.
At β, which of F, F′ and F″ has value zero?
β was found from the second-derivative equation.
F″(β) = 0. Here F(β) ≈ 1.39243 and F′(β) ≈ −1.17282 are both nonzero.
09 / Bracket the derivative target for input accuracy
The proposed input is −1.316
Its halfway boundaries are −1.3165 and −1.3155.
F′(−1.3165) > 0 and F′(−1.3155) < 0
Use the first derivative target, not F.
F′ is continuous and strictly decreasing throughout that bracket
There is one root between these bounds.
The stationary input therefore rounds to −1.316
Calculate the ordinate using a sufficiently refined input, rather than immediately discarding its extra digits.
Which target and halfway boundaries would verify β = −0.352 to 3 d.p.?
Use F″ and half a thousandth.
Test F″ at −0.3525 and −0.3515. Its values are negative and positive respectively, and the continuous strictly increasing target has a unique root inside.
Does proving the x-coordinate to 3 d.p. automatically prove that substituting its rounded value gives the y-coordinate to 3 d.p.?
The original function may amplify an input error.
No. Retain more working precision and verify the requested ordinate accuracy separately if needed. A steep original function can magnify the effect of input rounding.
10 / Include endpoints when finding an absolute extreme
Both stationary inputs lie in the interval
Use the two candidates already found.
F(−2) = e⁻² + 4/3 ≈ 1.468668617
Evaluate the left endpoint.
F(1) = e − 5/3 ≈ 1.051615162
Evaluate the right endpoint.
The stationary values are about 2.140498485 and 0.688484502
Compare all four values.
The absolute maximum is at the negative stationary point, and the absolute minimum at the positive one
This conclusion depends on the specified interval.
On [0, 0.4], where is the maximum of F?
The positive stationary input is beyond 0.4; F′ is negative throughout this shorter interval.
At x = 0, with F(0) = 1. The curve decreases over [0, 0.4], so the left endpoint is the maximum.
Must an absolute maximum on a closed interval be stationary?
Consider a strictly increasing function on [a, b].
No. It can occur at an endpoint. Include allowed endpoints and any other relevant nonsmooth candidates as well as stationary points.
11 / Keep the original curve and target equation separate
Different rearrangements, inverse-trig branches and starting values may find only some derivative roots. Use the original domain, disjoint brackets and suitable monotonicity arguments to support the completeness of a search. A smooth inflection also need not be stationary, and a stationary derivative root need not give a sign change in F′.
Can sign-change bracketing of H′ always locate the stationary point of H(x) = x³?
H′ = 3x² has the same sign on both sides of zero.
No. The stationary derivative root at zero has even multiplicity and does not change the sign of H′. Equal endpoint signs do not rule out a derivative root.
Summarise what is still required after a numerical method returns a root of F″.
An input alone is not a classified point.
Check the candidate lies in the domain, verify that F″ changes sign, calculate the original ordinate F(x), determine whether F′ is zero if stationary status matters, and justify any requested accuracy.
Section 1 of 11 · Solve an equation for the feature you want