Hersi Maths WhatsApp me

Understand · explore · practise

Finding stationary and inflection points numerically

Use numerical methods on first and second derivatives to find stationary and inflection points. Choose the correct Newton denominator, restore original coordinates, verify accuracy and classify with sign changes.

Before you startDifferentiation; stationary and inflection points; Newton–Raphson

01 / Solve an equation for the feature you want

A root of a derivative describes the original curve.

Stationary input: F′(x) = 0. Inflection candidate: F″(x) = 0, where these derivatives exist.

Numerical root methods can be applied to a derivative just as they can to an original function. Name the target G clearly: G = F′ for stationary inputs, or G = F″ for smooth inflection candidates.

After finding a candidate input α, calculate its ordinate from the original F and classify the point. A zero second derivative alone is not enough to establish an inflection.

Choose the right function to solveExplore
Original curve and derivative root targetsFor F(x) = exp(x) + x³/3 − 2x, find two stationary points from F′ = 0 or an inflection candidate from F″ = 0. Switch between the original curve and the equation being solved.F(x) = exp(x) + x³/3 − 2xxF(x)x from −2 to 1.4 · selected input in goldThe target root is an input, not the final ordinate.

Stationary target: G(x) = F′(x) = exp(x) + x² − 2.

Start at x₀ = −1.5.

Restore the original ordinate with F(xₙ).

Newton uses G/G′, so this stationary-point calculation divides F′ by F″.

The approximate input must be classified before it is called a maximum, minimum or inflection point.

The two graph views share their scales. Values are computed at full stored precision. A displayed residual of zero at a late step reflects machine precision; the written sign checks justify the feature.

02 / Differentiate the target in Newton’s formula

The denominator changes when the equation changes.

For stationary points, set G(x) = F′(x).Worked example

G′(x) = F″(x)

Differentiate the equation actually being solved.

xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F′(xₙ)/F″(xₙ)

This is Newton’s method for F′ = 0.

For an inflection candidate, instead set G = F″

Then G′ = F‴.

The inflection-candidate update is xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F″(xₙ)/F‴(xₙ)

Where this quotient is defined; classification still follows separately.

01 · Select the target

Which equation should you solve to locate stationary points of F(x) = eˣ + x³/3 − 2x?

Hint

Differentiate once.

Worked solution

Solve F′(x) = eˣ + x² − 2 = 0. Its derivative for Newton is F″(x) = eˣ + 2x.

02 · Select the inflection denominator

For the same F, write F‴(x) and the Newton update for an inflection candidate.

Hint

Differentiate F″, not F again from scratch.

Worked solution

F‴(x) = eˣ + 2. Thus xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − [exp(xₙ) + 2xₙ]/[exp(xₙ) + 2].

03 / Find the left stationary input

Bracket a derivative root before refining it.

Use F(x) = eˣ + x³/3 − 2x.Worked example

F′(−1.5) > 0 and F′(−1) < 0

There is a stationary input between −1.5 and −1.

Start x₀ = −1.5 and apply Newton to F′

Use denominator F″ = eˣ + 2x.

x₁ ≈ −1.329617451507

First substitution.

x₂ ≈ −1.316061843802; x₃ ≈ −1.315973781517

The input approaches about −1.31597378.

Calculate F at the refined input

The ordinate is approximately 2.14049849.

Move from a derivative root back to its original curve point

Pause, replay or seek freely. The notes explain the same idea and stay in view.

03 · Restore the coordinate

If a root of F′ is α ≈ −1.31597378, is the stationary point (α, 0)?

Hint

The zero belongs to F′, not to F.

Worked solution

No. The stationary point is (α, F(α)), approximately (−1.3160, 2.1405). The point (α, 0) lies on the derivative graph.

05 / Classify the stationary points

Use the original function’s derivative information.

Classify the two stationary points of F.Worked example

At the negative input, F″ ≈ −2.36373454 < 0

The stationary point is a local maximum.

At the positive input, F″ ≈ 2.78588506 > 0

The stationary point is a local minimum.

Alternatively, inspect the sign of F′ around each input

Positive to negative means a local maximum; negative to positive means a local minimum.

If F″ is zero, this simple second-derivative classification is inconclusive

Use a sign test or further analysis.

05 · An inconclusive second derivative

For H(x) = x⁴, H′(0) = H″(0) = 0. Is the point unclassifiable?

Hint

Check H′ on either side.

Worked solution

No. H′(x) = 4x³ changes from negative to positive, so (0, 0) is a local minimum. Only the simple second-derivative test was inconclusive.

06 · A stationary point without a turn

For H(x) = x³, explain why solving H′ = 0 gives neither a maximum nor a minimum.

Hint

H′(x) = 3x² is positive on both sides of zero.

Worked solution

The curve increases on both sides, so it does not turn. Since H″(x) = 6x changes sign, (0, 0) is a stationary inflection.

06 / Solve the second derivative equation

Locate a candidate, then check the change of concavity.

For F, seek a root of G(x) = F″(x) = eˣ + 2x.Worked example

G(−0.5) < 0 and G(0) = 1 > 0

There is a candidate between −0.5 and 0.

G′(x) = eˣ + 2 > 0

The target is strictly increasing, so this root is unique.

Start x₀ = −0.5 and use xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − G(xₙ)/G′(xₙ)

The denominator is the third derivative of F.

x₁ ≈ −0.349044806428; x₂ ≈ −0.351732769537

Continue with stored precision.

x₃ ≈ −0.351733711249

This gives the inflection candidate input.

07 · Wrong target

A student uses xₙ₊₁ = xₙ − F(xₙ)/F′(xₙ) to find an inflection point. What equation is that iteration actually solving?

Hint

Look at the numerator.

Worked solution

It is Newton’s method for F(x) = 0, seeking a horizontal-axis intercept. For a smooth inflection candidate it should target F″ = 0 instead.

07 / Verify that the candidate is an inflection

The second derivative must change sign across it.

Let β ≈ −0.351733711249 be the root of F″.Worked example

F″ is strictly increasing and crosses zero at β

It is negative immediately to the left and positive immediately to the right.

The original curve changes from concave down to concave up

This proves an inflection, rather than just a zero second derivative.

F(β) ≈ 1.392429744951

Restore the original ordinate.

F′(β) ≈ −1.17281597, which is not zero

The inflection is nonstationary.

The point is approximately (−0.3517, 1.3924)

State coordinates on the original curve.

08 · A false inflection candidate

For H(x) = x⁴, H″(0) = 0. Why is zero not an inflection input?

Hint

H″(x) = 12x².

Worked solution

The second derivative is positive on both sides of zero, so concavity does not change. The zero alone is insufficient.

08 / Use the original ordinate and original slope

Do not confuse the target graph with the curve being studied.

At the nonstationary inflection of F.Worked example

β ≈ −0.351733711249

This is the root of the second derivative target.

The original ordinate is F(β) ≈ 1.392429744951

It is not F″(β), which is approximately zero.

The tangent gradient is F′(β) ≈ −1.172815973872

It is not the derivative of the root target.

A tangent equation is y − F(β) = F′(β)(x − β)

Use unrounded values until the requested final accuracy.

09 · A stationary tangent

What is the tangent equation at the local minimum of F, using its ordinate rounded to 4 d.p.?

Hint

A stationary tangent is horizontal.

Worked solution

y ≈ 0.6885. The exact equation is y = F(α), where α is the positive root of F′.

10 · Which graph has ordinate zero?

At β, which of F, F′ and F″ has value zero?

Hint

β was found from the second-derivative equation.

Worked solution

F″(β) = 0. Here F(β) ≈ 1.39243 and F′(β) ≈ −1.17282 are both nonzero.

09 / Bracket the derivative target for input accuracy

The sign check must use the equation that defined the input.

Verify the left stationary input to 3 d.p.Worked example

The proposed input is −1.316

Its halfway boundaries are −1.3165 and −1.3155.

F′(−1.3165) > 0 and F′(−1.3155) < 0

Use the first derivative target, not F.

F′ is continuous and strictly decreasing throughout that bracket

There is one root between these bounds.

The stationary input therefore rounds to −1.316

Calculate the ordinate using a sufficiently refined input, rather than immediately discarding its extra digits.

11 · Inflection accuracy

Which target and halfway boundaries would verify β = −0.352 to 3 d.p.?

Hint

Use F″ and half a thousandth.

Worked solution

Test F″ at −0.3525 and −0.3515. Its values are negative and positive respectively, and the continuous strictly increasing target has a unique root inside.

12 · Rounding the coordinate

Does proving the x-coordinate to 3 d.p. automatically prove that substituting its rounded value gives the y-coordinate to 3 d.p.?

Hint

The original function may amplify an input error.

Worked solution

No. Retain more working precision and verify the requested ordinate accuracy separately if needed. A steep original function can magnify the effect of input rounding.

10 / Include endpoints when finding an absolute extreme

Stationary points are only part of an interval comparison.

Find the absolute extrema of F on [−2, 1].Worked example

Both stationary inputs lie in the interval

Use the two candidates already found.

F(−2) = e⁻² + 4/3 ≈ 1.468668617

Evaluate the left endpoint.

F(1) = e − 5/3 ≈ 1.051615162

Evaluate the right endpoint.

The stationary values are about 2.140498485 and 0.688484502

Compare all four values.

The absolute maximum is at the negative stationary point, and the absolute minimum at the positive one

This conclusion depends on the specified interval.

13 · A restricted interval

On [0, 0.4], where is the maximum of F?

Hint

The positive stationary input is beyond 0.4; F′ is negative throughout this shorter interval.

Worked solution

At x = 0, with F(0) = 1. The curve decreases over [0, 0.4], so the left endpoint is the maximum.

14 · Do not omit endpoints

Must an absolute maximum on a closed interval be stationary?

Hint

Consider a strictly increasing function on [a, b].

Worked solution

No. It can occur at an endpoint. Include allowed endpoints and any other relevant nonsmooth candidates as well as stationary points.

11 / Keep the original curve and target equation separate

Solve, restore coordinates, classify and interpret.

Different rearrangements, inverse-trig branches and starting values may find only some derivative roots. Use the original domain, disjoint brackets and suitable monotonicity arguments to support the completeness of a search. A smooth inflection also need not be stationary, and a stationary derivative root need not give a sign change in F′.

  • Choose G = F′ for stationary inputs, or G = F″ for smooth inflection candidates.
  • Newton divides G by G′.
  • Restore y from F, not G.
  • Classify stationary points and verify concavity changes.
  • Bracket the correct target for input accuracy.
  • Check branches, the requested interval and endpoints.

15 · An even derivative root

Can sign-change bracketing of H′ always locate the stationary point of H(x) = x³?

Hint

H′ = 3x² has the same sign on both sides of zero.

Worked solution

No. The stationary derivative root at zero has even multiplicity and does not change the sign of H′. Equal endpoint signs do not rule out a derivative root.

16 · The complete method

Summarise what is still required after a numerical method returns a root of F″.

Hint

An input alone is not a classified point.

Worked solution

Check the candidate lies in the domain, verify that F″ changes sign, calculate the original ordinate F(x), determine whether F′ is zero if stationary status matters, and justify any requested accuracy.

Section 1 of 11 · Solve an equation for the feature you want